by Rob Eagar Author’s page┬á┬á┬á As seen on http://www.bookbusinessmag.com/author/robeagar/

Many publishers believe that building a Facebook audience is a wise way to market books. LetÔÇÖs run with that assumption for a minute. What if you succeeded in attracting a lot of Facebook fans? I mean really succeed, such amassing over 1,000,000 likes to your Facebook page.

YouÔÇÖd probably feel happy about your social media efforts. Plus, youÔÇÖd probably expect to sell a lot of books to your Facebook audience, right? You could simply post information about your front list releases, back list titles, upcoming author events, special deals, etc. Then, sit back and watch as thousands of people respond. If only this theory worked in reality.

Instead, what if you were penalized for succeeding on social media? What if Facebook limited most of your own fans from seeing your posts? What if you tried to promote a new book, but only a tiny group received the news? What if you even offered something for free, but less than 10% of your fans got the chance to respond? How would you feel if your Facebook efforts began to backfire?

One of my consulting clients recently faced this dilemma. They are one of the most successful publishing houses on Facebook with over 1,000,000 likes. Their marketing staff worked hard for several years to attract such a large online audience. Everyone should be happy, and they should be selling lots of books to their Facebook fans. Yet, the more the publisher grows their Facebook audience, the more their situation worsens.

Holding Readers Hostage & Demanding a Ransom

When people choose to ÔÇ£likeÔÇØ your Facebook page, theyÔÇÖre asking to receive updates from your organization. In addition, if those people willingly chose to ÔÇ£likeÔÇØ your page, youÔÇÖd think Facebook would allow you to connect with those people. Seems like common sense. But, common sense can be uncommon when social media is involved.

Facebook is in business to make money, rather than help promote books to readers. ThatÔÇÖs a sensible expectation. Facebook should be encouraged to make a profit and thrive ÔÇö just like any other company. But, have they gone too far?

If you want to reach your own Facebook audience, itÔÇÖs going to cost you. The bigger your fan base, the more money you must pay. ThatÔÇÖs right, the audience that you took the time, resources, and effort to attract is held captive until you pay up. Facebook holds readers hostage and demands a ransom. If you want to reach your fans, you must pay to reach them, which otherwise known as ÔÇ£promoteÔÇØ your post or buy a Facebook ad.

On the surface, thereÔÇÖs nothing wrong with Facebook hindering your ability to reach your own fans. Mark Zuckerberg built the platform, turned it into a worldwide empire, and can make his own rules. But, the situation is starting to get ridiculous.

Upon examination of data from my publishing clients, we found that Facebook typically limits the exposure of posts to only 5-10% of the total audience. In other words, 90 ÔÇô 95% of fans never see the posts and updates they requested to receive. That seems pretty lop-sided. Yet, thatÔÇÖs not the worst part.

When my clients create a post to openly market a new book, or even give away a free resource, Facebook limits the exposure even more. Only 2-5% of fans see the posts! ThatÔÇÖs right, 95-98% of fans never see the information. Again, these are people who chose to ÔÇ£likeÔÇØ a publisherÔÇÖs page and willingly agreed to receive new posts.

Pay to Play

If you want to reach the majority of fans on your Facebook page, youÔÇÖre left with only one option ÔÇö pay money. Sure, Facebook will tell you that they let posts reach a larger audience if it gets high engagement, such as a lot of comments and shares. But, letÔÇÖs be real, when youÔÇÖre attempting to market a book, youÔÇÖre not going to get a lot of comments and shares.

YouÔÇÖve got to pay Facebook to reach the audience that you amassed. How much are we talking? I could not find definitive answers to this question. But, numbers mentioned by my clients hovered around $100 to reach 20,000 fans. ThatÔÇÖs $100 per each individual post you want to promote, which is a lot of money when applied to a large following:

20,000 fans = $100

100,000 fans = $500

500,000 fans = $2,500

1,000,000 fans = $5,000

Most publishers donÔÇÖt have the marketing budgets to spend $500 ÔÇô $5,000 for a single Facebook post. Multiply that cost over a typical catalog and it adds up quick. Also, keep in mind that a post is only seen by fans if they are logged-in to Facebook that day. If they arenÔÇÖt logged-in, they wonÔÇÖt see the promotion, no matter how much money you spend.

This problem begs the question, ÔÇ£Can publishers afford to build a large audience on Facebook?ÔÇØ The more fans you attract, the more you have to pay. Draw 1,000,000 fans and youÔÇÖve got to spend $5,000 every time you want to reach them. The law of diminishing returns comes into play.

Email to the Rescue

Is there a better option than paying money to Facebook just to reach your own fans? Yes, consider the advantages of email:

  1. Audience Exposure Rate: Typical email open rates are around 13-25%. ThatÔÇÖs much higher than FacebookÔÇÖs exposure rate of 2-10% for free posts.
  1. Monthly Pricing: Assuming you have 1,000,000 fans, youÔÇÖd have to pay Facebook around $5,000 per week or $20,000 per month to reach all of them with a weekly promotion. What if you had 1,000,000 email subscribers? According to MailChimp, a popular email service, youÔÇÖd only have to pay $4,200 per month, which is 75% less. Plus, you get to send out up to 3 emails per week. Email offers less cost and more frequent contact with consumers.
  1. Additional Marketing Information: Facebook ads and promoted posts tend to constrict the amount of marketing information that publishers can display about products. Advertisers are usually limited to displaying one image, a video, and a small amount of text. In contrast, email allows marketers to include a lot more content, such as additional images, video links, descriptive text, and related products. Email offers more versatility than a Facebook post.
  1. Detailed Campaign Reporting: Email offers specific reporting features that allow marketers to track consumer activity, including who opens an email, which hyperlinks get the most attention, who clicks on a specific link, etc. Facebook doesnÔÇÖt share this level of detailed reporting.

Facebook has built the largest online community in the world. Their platform has helped publishers build large online communities of their own. But, FacebookÔÇÖs system of forcing publishers to pay significant money just to reach all of their own audience is unreasonable. Mark Zuckerberg could easily change his platform to more of a win-win dynamic for everyone involved. Yet, heÔÇÖs got to keep his stock price high and please investors ÔÇö all at the expense of book publishers paying a ransom to reach their own readers.

Rob Eagar Author’s page

Rob Eagar is a book publishing consultant, helping clients create three different types of New York Times bestsellers, including frontlist non-fiction, frontlist fiction, and backlist non-fiction. He is the founder of Wildfire Marketing, a consulting firm that has worked with numerous publishers and coached over 400 authors.